Its not rocket science, its pure math.
History doesnt repeat exactly in the same way, except with fiat, with fiat always ends in the same way, doesnt matter how powerful the empire is.
You can't print +25% of shares in a year and expect the value going up in an asset with +100 years of history.
When US dollars were based in a scarce asset like gold the math worked, but after 1971, MBS, CDOs, and other financial products, the value was condemned.
The only way to save the dollar is to peg it again to a new real asset based in deflationary supply, fixed distribution and assured scarcity.
It doesnt matter if you like it or not, the best solution is peg the dollar to Bitcoin.
History doesnt repeat exactly in the same way, except with fiat, with fiat always ends in the same way, doesnt matter how powerful the empire is.
You can't print +25% of shares in a year and expect the value going up in an asset with +100 years of history.
When US dollars were based in a scarce asset like gold the math worked, but after 1971, MBS, CDOs, and other financial products, the value was condemned.
The only way to save the dollar is to peg it again to a new real asset based in deflationary supply, fixed distribution and assured scarcity.
It doesnt matter if you like it or not, the best solution is peg the dollar to Bitcoin.