On the daily chart, a bearish bat pattern is hidden within a bullish ABCD pattern. As long as monthly momentum is negative, I'm looking for an entry on the hourly from a 4-hour retracement from a bullish butterfly that should end in profit around a bearish order block, on the 987 off 100 ema that's between 1650 and 1700.
The Bat Pattern is a specific price pattern in technical analysis that is used to identify potential price reversals in financial markets. The pattern is named after its shape, which resembles the wings of a bat. The Bat Pattern is a variation of the more well-known Gartley Pattern and involves four price swings, with specific Fibonacci retracement and extension levels between them.
The Bat Pattern is considered a harmonic pattern, as it is based on Fibonacci ratios and seeks to identify potential areas of support or resistance in the market. Traders who use the Bat Pattern look for the completion of the pattern and use it as a signal to enter a trade in the direction of the anticipated price reversal.
The bullish ABCD pattern is a specific price pattern in technical analysis that is used to identify potential bullish price movements in financial markets. The pattern is formed by three price swings, labeled AB, BC, and CD, with specific Fibonacci ratios between them.
In a bullish ABCD pattern, the AB leg is a downward price movement, followed by the BC leg, which is an upward retracement of the AB leg. The CD leg is a final upward price movement, which should be equivalent to the AB leg in terms of price distance and time.
Traders who use the bullish ABCD pattern look for the completion of the pattern and use it as a signal to enter a long (buy) trade in the direction of the anticipated price movement. The pattern can be used in conjunction with other technical analysis tools to increase the likelihood of a successful trade.
There are several ways Ethereum could fail, including:
1. Security vulnerabilities: If a critical security flaw is discovered in the Ethereum protocol or its smart contracts, it could be exploited by attackers and cause significant damage to the network.
2. Governance issues: If the community is unable to agree on important decisions regarding the future direction of Ethereum, it could lead to fragmentation and loss of confidence in the platform.
3. Competition from other platforms: If other blockchain platforms offer better features or performance than Ethereum, it could lead to a mass migration of users and developers away from the network.
4. Regulatory challenges: If governments around the world decide to crack down on cryptocurrencies or blockchain technology, it could limit the growth of Ethereum and other similar platforms.
5. Technical limitations: If the Ethereum network is unable to scale to handle a large number of users and transactions, it could lead to congestion and high transaction fees, making it less attractive to users.
Staking is generally considered to be more environmentally friendly than proof of work, as it doesn't require large amounts of computational power to validate transactions. However, there are some potential issues with staking that could cause problems for a blockchain network, including:
1. Centralization: In a staking system, those who hold the most coins (or "stake") have more power over the network, which could lead to centralization and potentially malicious behavior.
2. Slashing risks: If a validator fails to follow the rules of the network, they can have their stake slashed, potentially leading to financial losses and discouraging participation.
3. Network security: If a large number of validators drop out of the network, it could weaken the security of the network and make it more vulnerable to attacks.
4. Economic incentives: In a staking system, the economic incentives for validators may not align with the overall health of the network, which could lead to suboptimal behavior.
Overall, staking is generally considered to be a more efficient and environmentally friendly way of securing a blockchain network, but it does come with its own set of risks and challenges that need to be carefully managed.
The Bat Pattern is a specific price pattern in technical analysis that is used to identify potential price reversals in financial markets. The pattern is named after its shape, which resembles the wings of a bat. The Bat Pattern is a variation of the more well-known Gartley Pattern and involves four price swings, with specific Fibonacci retracement and extension levels between them.
The Bat Pattern is considered a harmonic pattern, as it is based on Fibonacci ratios and seeks to identify potential areas of support or resistance in the market. Traders who use the Bat Pattern look for the completion of the pattern and use it as a signal to enter a trade in the direction of the anticipated price reversal.
The bullish ABCD pattern is a specific price pattern in technical analysis that is used to identify potential bullish price movements in financial markets. The pattern is formed by three price swings, labeled AB, BC, and CD, with specific Fibonacci ratios between them.
In a bullish ABCD pattern, the AB leg is a downward price movement, followed by the BC leg, which is an upward retracement of the AB leg. The CD leg is a final upward price movement, which should be equivalent to the AB leg in terms of price distance and time.
Traders who use the bullish ABCD pattern look for the completion of the pattern and use it as a signal to enter a long (buy) trade in the direction of the anticipated price movement. The pattern can be used in conjunction with other technical analysis tools to increase the likelihood of a successful trade.
There are several ways Ethereum could fail, including:
1. Security vulnerabilities: If a critical security flaw is discovered in the Ethereum protocol or its smart contracts, it could be exploited by attackers and cause significant damage to the network.
2. Governance issues: If the community is unable to agree on important decisions regarding the future direction of Ethereum, it could lead to fragmentation and loss of confidence in the platform.
3. Competition from other platforms: If other blockchain platforms offer better features or performance than Ethereum, it could lead to a mass migration of users and developers away from the network.
4. Regulatory challenges: If governments around the world decide to crack down on cryptocurrencies or blockchain technology, it could limit the growth of Ethereum and other similar platforms.
5. Technical limitations: If the Ethereum network is unable to scale to handle a large number of users and transactions, it could lead to congestion and high transaction fees, making it less attractive to users.
Staking is generally considered to be more environmentally friendly than proof of work, as it doesn't require large amounts of computational power to validate transactions. However, there are some potential issues with staking that could cause problems for a blockchain network, including:
1. Centralization: In a staking system, those who hold the most coins (or "stake") have more power over the network, which could lead to centralization and potentially malicious behavior.
2. Slashing risks: If a validator fails to follow the rules of the network, they can have their stake slashed, potentially leading to financial losses and discouraging participation.
3. Network security: If a large number of validators drop out of the network, it could weaken the security of the network and make it more vulnerable to attacks.
4. Economic incentives: In a staking system, the economic incentives for validators may not align with the overall health of the network, which could lead to suboptimal behavior.
Overall, staking is generally considered to be a more efficient and environmentally friendly way of securing a blockchain network, but it does come with its own set of risks and challenges that need to be carefully managed.