Bitcoin REALISM

I am definitely not going to win any popularity competitions with my comments and thoughts. But that's not the point when it comes to making money.

The main issue for me still in Crypto Land is the lack of realism. The image on the front cover was from a google search of "realism" I guess the confused face made my day. This is exactly how you need to be looking when you read these points below.

I have explained the logic of every major move over the last couple of years and this guys - is no different.

So let's start by exploring the reality of market cap for one. When you buy a stock you have a number of stocks in circulation times that by the price and you can get a market cap. Of course, unlike most companies on the exchange Bitcoin CANNOT just issue new stock. We have to remember some Bitcoin are gone and lost forever so this number will likely end up around 20million and not the full 21m.

The current Market cap is roughly 19,806,000 x $42,897.

Let's call it a little over 820 Billion.

At the ATH of $69,000 we saw $1.302 Trillion.

Lets look at what is needed and an angle of attack if Bitcoin was to hit $500k by Jan 25, 26, 27, 28 or 2029.

This is only one aspect of the story.

Prior to the ETF launch people were saying silly things like "Trillions coming in, $100k imminent"

Blackrock's largest ETF is roughly $354 Billion. This is the SP500 fund founded back in 2001. So 23 years old roughly now.

Here's the actual chart.

What does this mean?

Well, let's say Blackrock decided to close their biggest ETF and throw it all into Bitcoin. That level would still not take us back to the current ATH.

Bullish, Bullish, Bullish - we are still $25,000+ under the current ATH.

So what about other ETF's? Obviously the market is bigger than just Blackrock. Let's look at this aspect too.

Look at the end of 2021 as the ETF market collectively was at it's high. We are talking about $10Trillion in 8,552 ETF's.

I've posted several times about the current COT landscape.

Clearly social media Bitcoin is buzzing and everyone is about to become rich, it's different this time and so on. Well, COT says otherwise.

Back at the top when everyone was calling for $135,000 I said the reason for the drop would be liquidity.

So why is this different?

I said there were two likely scenario's on the table as we moved down. The first was we were in an early stage accumulation, we needed to go up to 32k and back down to the low 20's. This would allow us to travel much higher and sustain such a large move.

The second option was bearish.

Well, I guess the second move played out.

The momentum is still clearly not with us - we are still 25K + under the current ATH - not what one would or should expect after 12 Bitcoin specific ETF's obtaining approval & launching.

Look at the momentum

People seem to fall into the echo chamber and all logic leaves the building. I have been at this game a long, long time. Seen it all before and I am sure I will see it again.

This does not mean I am Bearish or anti Bitcoin - not for one second. I am one of the lucky ones in at the right time, sold a lot on the way up and happy with the current holdings.

All I am trying to emphasis here - is don't get sucked into the void which is not supported by ANY sound logic.

I recently watched a couple of video's with Warren Buffet, another with Jim Rickards.

They both explained something very interesting in a very clear way. Although Anti Bitcoin - what they said made a lot of sense. The same lesson kinda applies to things like gold.

When you buy an asset, the asset can produce for you. So assume you buy a house - you get rental income each month and with the price of the property going up over time you make gains there. Buy a business same thing - Buffet explained this using a farm as the example. Sell grains, cows or whatever you farm. Over time you still hold the asset.

This isn't true for the likes of diamonds, gold or Bitcoin.

Hence it fits into the greater fool theory.

If I sell you my last bitcoin I picked up for less than $200.

You buy it all today at $42,850. You have to find someone else willing to pay you more than the $42,850 in the future. For me, this is the main reason I don't personally care up or down or sideways here. But many in the echo chamber do.

The average price across the breakeven addresses are around $37k - this is Breakeven not profit. So imagine majority of the retail crowd with an average entry after DCA'in at $37k.

These are all things to keep in mind when your playing shorter term moves. ETF's are structured in such a way long term growth can be expected, volatility get's somewhat reduced. You noticed what's happened on the weekends since the launch?

So whilst I expect it to go up in the long run. We need a healthy pullback as to be expected. This gives more time for real accumulation to happen - but this will also put some stress on that average (BE) level of $37k.

Just keep this in mind and one more thing if you want to comment on "oh your wrong - up only" give some logic to support it or I won't bother responding. This move will take time. For me, nothing has changed since 2022. We are not ready for new highs - YET...

Anyway enjoyed or not I thought it was worth another educational post.

Stay safe!




Disclaimer
This idea does not constitute as financial advice. It is for educational purposes only, our principle trader has over 20 years’ experience in stocks, ETF’s, and Forex. Hence each trade setup might have different hold times, entry or exit conditions, and will vary from the post/idea shared here. You can use the information from this post to make your own trading plan for the instrument discussed. Trading carries a risk; a high percentage of retail traders lose money. Please keep this in mind when entering any trade. Stay safe.