$BTCUSD #bitstamp Stomped, Mulls Decline | #bitcoin $BTC #forex
Friends,
Just as #bitstamp rallies, it remains unable to break above a significant 275.00/295.89 threashold, best appreciated on a WEEKLY chart, as follows:
A large geometry has outlined a Wolfe Wave completion at its Point-5 back on 12 JAN 2015, cratering a nadir at 152.40. However, a rallying from that candle has remained limp and lingering, allowing price to remain aloft that fateful candle's close, just above 211.85.
SO, WHAT NOW?
At this point, price action has delineated two physical structures, one above within a relatively narrow range of 275.00/295.89 and another below at 211.85, opening the possibility of two directional scenarios: One bullish (less probable) and one bearish (more probale).
THE BULLISH SCENARIO:
A bullish scenario would have to absorb the bearish nay-sayers that have built a solid entrenchment across this aforementioned 275.00/295.89 range.
Looking back, Point-3 of the large geometry offered a subsequent pivot where prior bulls converted to bears, and remained bears at the periods of 02 MAR, 09 MAR and 16 MAR 2015, which correspond to the bars where bulls have failed to climb a blood murk of an uphill.
Now, comes 20 JUN 2015 and this current week, where we remain at the low end of the bars, pulled not by gravitational disillusionment, but simply pushed by the same bearish resistance, well entrenched in that range.
It is this very range that, if overcome, would convert bears to bull and turn it from a resistance to support, and open the sky up to the price level of Point-4 above, namely the 442.00/453.92 range.
THE BEARISH SCENARIO:
In the more plausible realm, a decline should the prime object of contemplation here. Not because bears have their moment up above, but simply because this remains the path of least resistance, especially in a technical context.
For instance, a Fibonacci cluster between the 1-2 Leg extension at 1.414 and the recent failure from Point-5 to the pivot level, itself extending a 1.618 alignment - This discreet cluster offers room for price to carve out further decline, effectively knocking stop-losses on the way to building a much needed bullish momentum.
The most proximate support line remains the multi-year trendline which has imposed consistent support. This is the line which most junior traders will use as their reference, under which they will line up their stop-losses. This is thus the level to keep in sight, which if breached, is likely to cause a stop-loss glutonic spike down to as far as the Fib cluster, which is estimated to wait at about 58.96.
This last value is NOT a target, but a reasonable level of support, if indeed this bearish scenario were to play out.
OVERALL, price is getting squeeze by significant technical levels. A bullish scenario would have to come by in the tangible form of a major fundamental news release, as the technicals alone lack the weight to pierce through fat bears. In contrast, a bearish scenario would have to contemplate historical support which has widely indoctrinated a generation of Pavlovian cryto'ers, likely herding a field of stop-losses below this susceptible trendline.
Best,
David Alcindor
Predictive Analysis & Forecasting
Durango, Colorado - USA
-----
Twitter:
@4xForecaster
LinkedIn:
David Alcindor
-----
.
Just as #bitstamp rallies, it remains unable to break above a significant 275.00/295.89 threashold, best appreciated on a WEEKLY chart, as follows:
A large geometry has outlined a Wolfe Wave completion at its Point-5 back on 12 JAN 2015, cratering a nadir at 152.40. However, a rallying from that candle has remained limp and lingering, allowing price to remain aloft that fateful candle's close, just above 211.85.
SO, WHAT NOW?
At this point, price action has delineated two physical structures, one above within a relatively narrow range of 275.00/295.89 and another below at 211.85, opening the possibility of two directional scenarios: One bullish (less probable) and one bearish (more probale).
THE BULLISH SCENARIO:
A bullish scenario would have to absorb the bearish nay-sayers that have built a solid entrenchment across this aforementioned 275.00/295.89 range.
Looking back, Point-3 of the large geometry offered a subsequent pivot where prior bulls converted to bears, and remained bears at the periods of 02 MAR, 09 MAR and 16 MAR 2015, which correspond to the bars where bulls have failed to climb a blood murk of an uphill.
Now, comes 20 JUN 2015 and this current week, where we remain at the low end of the bars, pulled not by gravitational disillusionment, but simply pushed by the same bearish resistance, well entrenched in that range.
It is this very range that, if overcome, would convert bears to bull and turn it from a resistance to support, and open the sky up to the price level of Point-4 above, namely the 442.00/453.92 range.
THE BEARISH SCENARIO:
In the more plausible realm, a decline should the prime object of contemplation here. Not because bears have their moment up above, but simply because this remains the path of least resistance, especially in a technical context.
For instance, a Fibonacci cluster between the 1-2 Leg extension at 1.414 and the recent failure from Point-5 to the pivot level, itself extending a 1.618 alignment - This discreet cluster offers room for price to carve out further decline, effectively knocking stop-losses on the way to building a much needed bullish momentum.
The most proximate support line remains the multi-year trendline which has imposed consistent support. This is the line which most junior traders will use as their reference, under which they will line up their stop-losses. This is thus the level to keep in sight, which if breached, is likely to cause a stop-loss glutonic spike down to as far as the Fib cluster, which is estimated to wait at about 58.96.
This last value is NOT a target, but a reasonable level of support, if indeed this bearish scenario were to play out.
OVERALL, price is getting squeeze by significant technical levels. A bullish scenario would have to come by in the tangible form of a major fundamental news release, as the technicals alone lack the weight to pierce through fat bears. In contrast, a bearish scenario would have to contemplate historical support which has widely indoctrinated a generation of Pavlovian cryto'ers, likely herding a field of stop-losses below this susceptible trendline.
Best,
David Alcindor
Predictive Analysis & Forecasting
Durango, Colorado - USA
-----
Twitter:
@4xForecaster
LinkedIn:
David Alcindor
-----
.
Comment:
29 OCT 2015 - $BTC:
Alright. So, M15 dead. H1 dead. H4 dead = Big boys are buying like crazy.
Looking at the Model from the UP-side, here are the most relevant and probable levels of resistance, in fading order:
1 - TG-Hi = 332.18 - 29 OCT 2015
2 - TG-Hix = 349.31 - 29 OCT 2015
AND
3 - WL = 372.22 - 29 OCT 2015
In terms of geometry, here is a probable ATHENA:
Re-entry into SHORT is not worth, unless price commits to below the TRIGGER LINE:
All future analysis will be rendered off of DAILY, until larger players are done flossing their teeth of retail trader remnants.
David
Alright. So, M15 dead. H1 dead. H4 dead = Big boys are buying like crazy.
Looking at the Model from the UP-side, here are the most relevant and probable levels of resistance, in fading order:
1 - TG-Hi = 332.18 - 29 OCT 2015
2 - TG-Hix = 349.31 - 29 OCT 2015
AND
3 - WL = 372.22 - 29 OCT 2015
In terms of geometry, here is a probable ATHENA:
Re-entry into SHORT is not worth, unless price commits to below the TRIGGER LINE:
All future analysis will be rendered off of DAILY, until larger players are done flossing their teeth of retail trader remnants.
David
Comment:
29 OCT 2015 - Chart Update:
Following is a cut/paste from the room:
====================
Best,
David Alcindor
Following is a cut/paste from the room:
====================
4xForecaster====================
29 OCT 2015 - $BTC:
Alright. So, M15 dead. H1 dead. H4 dead = Big boys are buying like crazy.
Looking at the Model from the UP-side, here are the most relevant and probable levels of resistance, in fading order:
1 - TG-Hi = 332.18 - 29 OCT 2015
2 - TG-Hix = 349.31 - 29 OCT 2015
AND
3 - WL = 372.22 - 29 OCT 2015
In terms of geometry, here is a probable ATHENA:
Re-entry into SHORT is not worth, unless price commits to below the TRIGGER LINE:
All future analysis will be rendered off of DAILY, until larger players are done flossing their teeth of retail trader remnants.
David
Best,
David Alcindor
Comment:
02 NOV 2015 - Chart Update / Tech-Note:
All targets hit ... Just posted in $BTC Room:
======================
02 NOV 2015 - All Targets Hit ... WL remains improbable, but pending:
$BTCUSD - M15 Chart:
$BTCUSD - Daily Chart:
David Alcindor
======================
($BTC Room: www.tradingview.com/chat/ )
David Alcindor
All targets hit ... Just posted in $BTC Room:
======================
02 NOV 2015 - All Targets Hit ... WL remains improbable, but pending:
$BTCUSD - M15 Chart:
$BTCUSD - Daily Chart:
David Alcindor
======================
($BTC Room: www.tradingview.com/chat/ )
David Alcindor
Comment:
15 NOV 2015 - A recap of the past week postings on the $BTC Room (Link: www.tradingview.com/chat/ )
====================================
====================================
4xForecaster
07 NOV 2015 - $BTC-Weekly Chart:
So far, the weekly chart has remained the most responsive chart. On 02 NOV 2015, it produced a series of bullish targets, namely:
4xForecaster
1 - TG-1 = 407.24 - 02 NOV 2015 - This is a quantitative target, so it has little reversible effect on price, but it will often cause price to return back to it, acting as a future R/S level (if in new price territories), or confirming prior R/S levels if moving into prior territories;
AND
2 - TG-2 = 504.57 - 02 NOV 2015 - Here too, the target is a "Quant-Target", so it has little to no stopping power ... Yet, this is exactly what occurred in the chart, interestingly (well, to me, since this is not suposed to occur - What should have occurred was a shallow retracement, then a push to the qualitative targets, TG-Hi, TG-Hix.)
Again, this $BTC is simply not acting as expected, so I won't really chance anything here in terms of predictive/forecasting pronouncement.
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
@iefan - I see how you are looking at it.
Yes, in this fashion, price can. The "mis"-behavior of the Quant-Target occurred by a lack of moving straight towards the Qual-Target - It is not a necessity, but a "next-step" occurrence that I had expected.
Instead, and as you have charted it, it is quite possible that price would seek a resting place at the 0.618 level:
This is a level which may also seek confirmation of a "transmural", or validation of a prior structure "across the wall":
David Alcindor
Comment:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
10 NOV 2015 - $BTC-Daily Chart:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
... Expect a pull-back from this level ("transmural"):
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
@Diabolicus - Transmural simply means across ("trans") the wall ("mural").
It's simply a term I use to refer to a probable price reacting to a structure high/low that exists on the other side of a swing.
In geometric terms, the wall ("mural") acts as a line of symmetry where a Resistance Level (R) turns into a Support Level (S) across the wall:
This is a very simple patterning of price action which is quite ubiquitous.
For instance, within this same price field, there is another one at the bottom left:
There is nothing too refined about these levels, except that most traders might over-react to the intervening swing (mural) and may forget that it can be used instead as a measuring stick to establish a probable support once price returns from its wild move ... That level is defined by the base that prepared for the swing. I use this to remain aware of a potential consolidation or reversal:
Regarding the next price action IF price were to rise from the current level, then I could just as easily estimate a probable level of resistance (R) relative to the cluster of support (S) that occurred prior ro the significant down-swing - Following is what I would tend to project visually in the field.
David
I may be a bit crude, but that is what I would do if I only had highs and lows to go by (structural analysis).
4xForecaster
14 NOV 2015 - $BTC:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
14 NOV 2015 - $BTC - Weekly Chart:
Relevant validation points and possible level of support:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
Hello @BitProf - First three targets are TG-1, 2, 3 - Numerical (quantitative) targets carry a HIGHER probability of being hit than qualitative targets, but lesser ability to cause reversal in price.
The last two values are TG-Lo and TG-Lox, which are qualitative targets. "Qual-targets" carry a LESSER probability of being hit relative to "Quant-Targets", but if attained, they will act as reversal levels.
David
4xForecaster========================================
15 NOV 2015 - $BTC - 4-Hour Chart:
David Alcindor
... Look for these possible symmetrical projections - David
David Alcindor
Comment:
18 NOV 2015 - Chart Update / Tech-Note:
Following is a cut/paste of what has been going on in the $BTC room:
=========================================
Thank you for following. Much appreciate your interest in these and other analyses.
Best,
David Alcindor
Following is a cut/paste of what has been going on in the $BTC room:
=========================================
4xForecaster
15 NOV 2015 - $BTC - 15-Min. Chart:
Failure of this area would be very bearish:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
16 NOV 2015 - $BTC - M15:
Price likely to be bound in this range - A break of either side may point to subsequent direction at this lower TF:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
16 NOV 2015 - $BTC - 15-Min. Chart:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
16 NOV 2015 - Re: $BTC - M15 Chart:
Watch for a break of floor risk:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
17 NOV 2015 - $BTC:
Bears are weighing down on M15 ... Floor continues to hold:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
18 NOV 2015 - $BTC - H1:
Price expected to rise to 375.35:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
... $BTC ... 377.21 is the approximate end of this reciprocal ab = cd symmetry:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
... $BTC ... Fibonacci's 0.396 also in line with above technical points:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
... $BTC:
And of course, this standard 1.618-FE:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster================================
... $BTC - 4-Hour Chart:
A few days ago, I posted the following 4-hour chart, to which I have added each of the points:
At the time, Point-4 remained uncertain. However, I would now suspect that Point-4 would find an approximate residence near 375.5, as per 1-hour chart.
Bringing the two timeframes (H1 and H4) together, here is what we get:
Note that the alignment of the two ab = cd is lost (pink square pointed by arrow), ... until ab x 1.414 of the second symmetry regains alignment with the larger symmetry:
OVERALL: Following is the expected geometry (BLUE), as well as bearish projection:
Mind you that this 242.43 level represents just one bearish target ... See other targets in earlier posts.
David Alcindor
@Diabolicus - Yes. Fat fingers ... I meant to type 0.386. Thank you!
Thank you for following. Much appreciate your interest in these and other analyses.
Best,
David Alcindor
Comment:
4xForecaster
... $BTC: In addition to the larger Geo, here is an internal Geo development as well, suggesting a significant resistance at Point-4 of the larger (BLUE) Geo, in line with Point-5 of the internal Geo (BLACK):
Following is a probable price pathway, taking into account all aforementioned geometric contributions:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
... $BTC - 4-Hour: I would pay particular attention to the RSI channel ... A new trend - predominantly bearish - has emerged, and the upper border of the channel could point to a probable level of corresponding top in price:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
... $BTC - 4-Hour Chart:
Following is a refinement of the 4-hour chart, having adjusted the 2-4 Line slope:
David Alcindor
4xForecaster
18 NOV 2015 - $BTC - 4-Hour Chart:
As forecast, price continues to rally. As per recent analysis, this is expected to represent a limited bullish move, fashioned by the Geo and other aforementioned technical bounds:
David Alcindor.
From $BTC | Predictive & Forecasting Analysis room:
===================
===================
David Alcindor